<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Resolving the &#8220;Ask-The-Customer&#8221; Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zephram.de/blog/2010/01/08/resolving-the-ask-the-customer-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zephram.de/blog/2010/01/08/resolving-the-ask-the-customer-paradox/</link>
	<description>Einblicke in die erste Innovationsphase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Patrick Stähler</title>
		<link>http://www.zephram.de/blog/2010/01/08/resolving-the-ask-the-customer-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Stähler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zephram.de/blog/?p=2203#comment-353</guid>
		<description>The art is not to ask the customer but to have a conversation with the customer. And in this conversation we can look at the jobs-to-be done. And from these tasks we can derive a better value proposition not just a better product. 

The core problems with innovation is that we just ask existing customers and focus too much on product and process innovation. I think a conversational approach and looking at the whole business model for starting points of lasting innovation is much more effective in the long run.

More on these ideas on http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/03/great-innovation-getting-a-job-done/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The art is not to ask the customer but to have a conversation with the customer. And in this conversation we can look at the jobs-to-be done. And from these tasks we can derive a better value proposition not just a better product. </p>
<p>The core problems with innovation is that we just ask existing customers and focus too much on product and process innovation. I think a conversational approach and looking at the whole business model for starting points of lasting innovation is much more effective in the long run.</p>
<p>More on these ideas on <a href="http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/03/great-innovation-getting-a-job-done/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.business-model-innovation.com/2009/03/great-innovation-getting-a-job-done/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Filtering, Crowdsourcing and Innovation &#171; Book Reviews &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</title>
		<link>http://www.zephram.de/blog/2010/01/08/resolving-the-ask-the-customer-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Filtering, Crowdsourcing and Innovation &#171; Book Reviews &#171; Innovation Leadership Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zephram.de/blog/?p=2203#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] in a post that addresses some of the issues with crowdsourcing really nicely, Graham Horton says: In conclusion, customer idea portals as they are currently popularly advocated will produce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a post that addresses some of the issues with crowdsourcing really nicely, Graham Horton says: In conclusion, customer idea portals as they are currently popularly advocated will produce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Tim Kastelle</title>
		<link>http://www.zephram.de/blog/2010/01/08/resolving-the-ask-the-customer-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kastelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zephram.de/blog/?p=2203#comment-331</guid>
		<description>This is a nice way to frame the issues. So really, we need to be ambidextrous in this too - listening to the customers on some occasions, and not doing so on others. Much like the incremental v. radical tension. Sounds about right to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice way to frame the issues. So really, we need to be ambidextrous in this too &#8211; listening to the customers on some occasions, and not doing so on others. Much like the incremental v. radical tension. Sounds about right to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Tweets die Resolving the “Ask-The-Customer” Paradox &#124; Impulse für Innovation erwähnt -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.zephram.de/blog/2010/01/08/resolving-the-ask-the-customer-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets die Resolving the “Ask-The-Customer” Paradox &#124; Impulse für Innovation erwähnt -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zephram.de/blog/?p=2203#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] Dieser Eintrag wurde auf Twitter von Graham Horton, Tim Kastelle erwähnt. Tim Kastelle sagte: nice job of defining the boundaries RT @Graham_Horton: New blog article: Resolving the “Ask-The-Customer” Paradox http://bit.ly/7dsrqJ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dieser Eintrag wurde auf Twitter von Graham Horton, Tim Kastelle erwähnt. Tim Kastelle sagte: nice job of defining the boundaries RT @Graham_Horton: New blog article: Resolving the “Ask-The-Customer” Paradox <a href="http://bit.ly/7dsrqJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7dsrqJ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

